These are the facts.
Obama has never released a paper copy of his original long form birth certificate generated solely by Hawaii DOH.
What Obama has released is a PDF file of his original long form birth certificate created by Derek, and an exact copy of that particular PDF file that was transferred to paper.
The registrar and date stamps are in the exact same location on both documents, indicating that most likely both copies are exactly the same, in that one is an exact duplication of the other, and most likely not a separately created or generated document of the same image.
Both were created using the PDF as the master copy and original document.
Hawaii DOH did not send Obama any PDF files.
The PDF file was created for the benefit of Obama, most likely with his full knowledge of the creation of the file, if not actually based upon his own urging or order.
Hawaii DOH claims to have sent 2 separate paper copies created independently of each other to Obama.
What are the chances that 4 separate and independent actions taken on 2 different pieces of paper could produce an exact match.
Think about it, you stamp the date on the first copy and then the second copy, what are the chances that you will exactly match that location of the stamp both times?
50/50 at best.
Then you proceed to affix the registrars stamp to the documents on the first copy and then the second copy, what are the chances that you will exactly match that location of the stamp both times?
50/50 at best.
Remember, these are supposed to be manually applied stamps, not machine or computer-generated stamps, or are they?
If they were in fact computer-generated stamps, and I believe that they are, that would explain why they are in the exact same place on both copies.
In fact, this would create a 100% probability that the stamps would be located in the exact same place on each document as is clearly the case.
This is why we know that the copies are exactly the same, and that both were created from the PDF file, using the PDF file as the source document.
This is why we also know that neither copy provided by Obama to the public are copies of a scanned document provided to Obama from Hawaii DOH.
Now for my theory.
These facts are apparent because Hawaii DOH does not have that copy of Obama's original long form birth certificate on file, and did not send that document to Obama with an error in the registrars stamp.
If they did they most likely would have released a microfiche image like they did for the Nordyke twins.
Anyway, a 50 year old piece of paper kept in the best conditions would still have signs of aging, which Obama's does not, and would not contain the 2011 background security features image that Obama's does.
Why didn't Hawaii DOH just release a scan of the original long form birth certificate document in its original condition with its original background?
Answer, because one does not exist.
We know this because Hawaii DOH has not taken the responsibility for that error, because they did not create the error.
We know that the error has never been seen on any other released Hawaii DOH issued birth certificates, indicating that this would at best be as far as is known a one time error made twice by Hawaii DOH, but alas they will not admit blame for the error, and because we know that both copies are exactly the same, with one made from the other and that they are not separately generated and stamped documents, this is not plausible.
We know this because there is no other plausible explanation for how 4 independent separate actions on 2 pieces of paper could logically produce the evidence that we have been provided by Obama.
