A Natural born citizen must be jus soli and jus sanguinis. Look it up.
Back in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett,
ruled that:
“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of
two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The
Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort
must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature
of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted
that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became
themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”
Jus soli is defined as the principle that a person's nationality at birth is determined by the
place of birth.
Jus sanguinis is
defined as the principle that a person's nationality at birth is the same as
that of his natural parents.
Who is
the current pResident of the US? Is he Barack Hussein Obama, Harrison J
Bounell, Barry Soetoro,or Barry Dunham? All are aliases used by the usurper.
Here is a Supreme Court case from 1824 showing that the
Supreme court knew the difference between a Natural born citizen/subject long
before the passage of the 14th amendment.
All court decisions rendered that attribute natural born
citizenship to the `14th amendment are incorrect as the words natural born are
not included in the 14th amendment.
The statute of 11 and 12 William III,
c. 6, which is in force in Maryland, removes the common law disability of
claiming title through an alien ancestor, but does not apply to a living alien
ancestor, so as to create a title by heirship, where none would exist by the
common law, if the ancestor were a natural born subject or citizen. Thus, where
A died seized of lands in Maryland, leaving no heirs except B., a brother, who
was an alien, and had never been naturalized as a citizen of the United States,
and three nieces, the daughters of the said B, who were native citizens of the
United States; it was held that they could not claim title by inheritance
through B, their father, he being an alien and still living.
The case agreed stated that William McCreery was seized and
possessed of a tract of land in Baltimore County, in the State of Maryland,
called Clover Hill and died possessed thereof about 1 March, 1814. He had
previously executed an instrument of writing purporting to be his last will and
testament, by which he devised the above tract of land to those under whom the
defendant, Somerville, claimed; but it was witnessed by two persons only, and
was therefore inoperative to pass lands in Maryland, the laws of which require
three witnesses to a will for that purpose. W. McCreery left at his death no
children, but a brother, Ralph McCreery, a native of Ireland, who is still
living and who has not been naturalized, and three nieces, Letitia Barwell,
Jane McCreery, and Isabella McCreery, the latter being the lessor of the
plaintiff, who are the daughters of the said Ralph, and native born citizens of
the United States.
Page 22 U. S. 355
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/22/354/
We KNOW the Supreme Court knew what a Citizen was, They Knew a Natural Born Citizen WAS NOT a Natural Born Subject, They KNEW the ways in which to become a Citizen were Natural Born, Naturalized by law, so we are expected to believe that the Supreme Court had no idea that the words the Founding Fathers used in writing the Constitution were unknown by them to mean that a Natural Born Citizen meant the child of American Citizens born on the soil of American Citizens, Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis, because THEY NEVER WANTED the position of Commander-In-Chief to devolve to anyone but a Natural Born Citizen, because of loyalty, This is why the term has never been changed, They knew what it meant even if American SHEEPLE do not! America Got STUPID and a usurper took advantage of that STUPIDITY and STUPID SHEEPLE still haven't figured it out!
